There is no shortage of nonwood fiber material in this country.
U.S. farmers annually generate an estimated 280 million tons of excess
agricultural fiber, suitable for paper making . Generally these fibers
are known to be puled with higher fiber yields an wood and
require fewer chemicals to be processed, less water, and energy.
Farmers would benefit from new income from those residues that would otherwise
be burned. There would be new opportunities for value-added rotational
crops; new uses for over 65 million acres of idle farmland in the
United States, such as is widely found in
the State of Minnesota; and new replacement options for declining industries,
such as tobacco. These benefits to farmers and the environment cannot
be fully realized as long as logging subsidies give an unfair advantage
to wood at the expense of nonwoods and the American farmer.
In 1996, the American
Farm Bureau announced its support for industrial hemp. And in a
letter to Colorado legislators, International Paper wrote: “IP’s interest
in industrial hemp stems from logging shortage of wood fiber in North America
and the resultant need to develop new sources of fiber.”
The California Rice Growers Industry Association, which faces a moratorium
on the burning of rice straw, is strongly advocating use of rice straw
in pulp manufacture for newsprint. In 1996, a successful trial run
using Smurfit Newsprint Co. appeared in the Los Angeles Times, Oregonian,
Sacramento Bee and other major papers.
These
recent events indicate the proven potential of agricultural substitutes
for wood in paper. Most importantly this data indicates that America
can deep both its farmers and pulp and paper mills alive and well.
But we must move quickly to ensure that the U./S/ develops these capacities
soon, as not to be left behind by neighboring countries. Canada is already
developing these industries with diverse sectors such as automobile makers,
like Ford and Chrysler.
While it is in the public interest to protect public forestlands from
logging, private forestlands can be managed for productive uses following
the principles of ecoforestry. Ecologically responsible, local decision
making about forest use is critical to the practice of ecoforestry.
The basic principles of ecoforestry ensure that all plans and activities
protect forest functioning over time. Numerous citizens organizations,
such as the Public Forestry Foundation of Eugene, Oregon, sponsor
and organize training in ecologically responsible forest use.
Zero-Cut, the effort to end logging on public lands, is fast becoming
the most promising strategy
for forest protection in the U.S. While summing up their goal
in a simple phrase, Zero-Cut
proponents have developed a sophisticated analysis of the ecological,
economic, and social costs
of public lands logging, and of the benefits and opportunities that
would follow and end to such
practices.
In 1997, Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D-GA) and Congressman Jim Leach
(R-IA)
responded to the public's call for an end to public land logging by
introduction the National
Forest Protection and Restoration Act (NFPRA). Intended to save
taxpayer money, reduce the
deficit, cut corporate welfare, and protect and restore America's natural
heritage, the Act
eliminates the commercial logging program on federal public lands and
assists communities
dependent on this program with economic recovery and diversification.