Industrial
forestland, Astoria, Oregon
Total “commercial timberland”: 490 million acres, or 66% of all
U.S. forest. Commercial
timberlands are all forestlands outside of protected areas capable
of growing 20 cubic feet per acre per year.
National Forest acreage: 191 million acres.
Commercial timberlands ownership in the U.S.:
private - 73%
public - 27%
states - 7%
federal government - 20 %
National Forests - 17%
National Parks, National Wildlife Refuges, and lands managed by the
Bureau of Land
Management - 3%
Total annual U.S. wood consumption: 100.3 billion board feet.
Timber volume cut from National Forests in fiscal year 1996:
3.87
billion board feet, 3.9%
of the nation’s total yearly timber consumption.
When the National Forests were established, much of the more
accessible highly
productive forest in the U.S. was not included. As a consequence,
National Forest
timberland is, on average, of lower productivity, and on steeper, higher
elevation terrain
than are private timberlands. In the Northwest, for example,
only 22% of the most
productive timberland is found on National Forests. In the eastern
United States, steep
mountainous areas also predominate of federal forestlands. Their
terrain makes National
forests especially important for managing water flows and protecting
and maintaining
watershed conditions, and much less valuable for producing wood products.
Congress has mandated that the Forest Service and BLM maintain the underlying
principle
of forest productivity and not allow the value of the forest resource
to diminish. In the
terminology of the law, the forests were to be managed to insure “sustained
yield” of all
resources on the public's forest trust. However, since this law
passed in 1960, over three
million acres of old growth timber have been clearcut in the public
forests of the Pacific
Northwest and California alone. A study on Forest Service planning
(House Committee
on Interior Affairs, “Management of Federal Timber Resources: The Loss
of
Accountability,” June 15, 1992) found that the agency has sold timber
with no means of
ensuring that the fundamental requirements of the Multiple Use-Sustained
Yield Act have
been met, because it does not have auditing systems adequate to verify
that cut levels can
be sustained or that the use of clearcutting and other techniques have
not damaged the
productivity of the land.