[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: American dialect of Brithenig
- To: Sally Caves <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: American dialect of Brithenig
- From: Padraic Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:47:38 -0400 (EDT)
- cc: andrew <email@example.com>, John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-Reply-To: <37A5399B.A5681653@frontiernet.net>
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Sally Caves wrote:
> Sally Caves wrote:
> > Yikes, and forgive me; I seem to have forgotten the most important
> > element
> > of the Brithenig empire, GULP!! (head beating)... and that is that
> > there IS no Spanish, eh??? That the British and the Romance languages
> > have become absorbed in an important and influential empire early on?
> Wrong again... I'm rereading Padraic's Introduction to Kernu with its
> teeeeeensy tiny little writing. But the question still remains: what
Oh, get some specs! ;)
> is the status of the other Romance languages and cultures, and their
> influence in the colonization of America? Is there a Spain? Were
> their Conquistadors?
They're all there, and as John says in a state of rosy good health. I
suppose there must be conquistadores. I can't think of any way pre-15th
century British history could get rid of them.
One possibility, brought up in one of the alt-history groups: Colombus
sails on and never returns; Spanish energies after the Reconquista have to
go somewhere, and these are turned south into Muslim Africa and to the
east. Not likely, perhaps. :)
> SALLY CAVES
> http://www.frontiernet.net/~scaves (bragpage)
> http://www.frontiernet.net/~scaves/teonaht.html (T. homepage)
> http://www.frontiernet.net/~scaves/contents.html (all else)
> Niffodyr tweluenrem lis teuim an.
> "The gods have retractible claws."
> from _The Gospel of Bastet_